A Sneak Preview of Biden’s Earth Day Climate Change Festivities

Apr 21, 2021

Reading Time : 7 min

By: David H. Quigley, Kenneth J. Markowitz, Stacey H. Mitchell, Christopher A. Treanor, Shawn Whites (Energy Regulatory Specialist)

Akin Gump will track developments at and around the Summit closely and publish our analysis of the Summit’s outcomes on our Speaking Sustainability blog.

Below are some key issues to follow:

A New U.S. NDC Under the Paris Agreement

  • The administration has pledged an “ambitious” update. While the GHG reduction target is fundamental, the granularity of the roadmap for achieving this target is tantamount. Reports have grown that President Biden will pledge to cut GHG emissions by at least half by 2030.
  • Pressure had been peaking for the U.S. to reduce its GHG emissions by 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. For example, over 300 companies—including Apple, Google, Microsoft, Walmart and Starbucks—and dozens of European leaders recently called on the U.S. to pledge a 50 percent by 2030 target, as did over 1,500 scientists, who unsurprisingly emphasized reductions from the transportation and power sectors.

Updated NDCs from Other Summit Attendees

  • The State Department described the Summit as an opportunity for leaders of the 40 attending countries to reveal new NDCs in line with the goal of collectively preventing a 1.5-degree Celsius rise above pre-industrial levels.
  • John Kerry’s visit to China last week yielded a rare statement of cooperation that the countries would work to “raise ambition in the 2020s,” but it could be difficult for China to announce a new target outside of its already-formalized 14th Five-Year Plan. On that same trip, John Kerry lobbied India to set a net-zero goal, but India made no such commitment, and its Minister of Environment emphasized the need for leadership by the world’s biggest historical emitters. And the U.S. has been in negotiations with Brazil to put a stop to the deforestation of the Amazon, but an agreement is not expected before the Summit due to a stalemate over upfront foreign aid.
  • Though some attendees have already announced their targets—including the United Kingdom, which proposes to reduce emissions by 63 percent below 2005 levels—other big announcements to watch for include those of Canada, South Korea and Japan. Many are calling on these countries to join the so-called “50 Percent Club,” agreeing to the above-mentioned target of cutting emissions by at least 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. Japan is almost certain to make such a commitment, and South Korea and Canada are poised to announce stronger targets at the Summit.

Climate Change Mitigation Financing

  • Attendees include leaders from some small island and low-income nations whose major concerns include their need for climate resiliency aid from developed countries. President Biden’s budget proposal included $1.2 billion for the U.N. Green Climate Fund, which helps support developing countries’ climate change mitigation and adaptation projects. That falls well short of the $3 billion Obama pledged during his presidency, $2 billion of which is still outstanding.
  • Likewise, developed countries pledged in 2009 to jointly mobilize $100 billion per year by 2020 to aid developing countries in their climate endeavors, but have also fallen short. Leaders from the island and low-income nations will likely continue to pressure high-income Summit attendees to make good on their financing commitments, particularly since the pandemic has exacerbated the financial stresses of those island and low-income nations.

Additional Financing Announcements

  • South Korea is expected to announce a ban on coal financing, which is notable given the country is the third-largest financier of overseas coal projects, and there is mounting pressure for the U.S. to do the same.
  • The U.S. Treasury Department will reveal a plan for distributing billions of dollars in climate change mitigation and clean energy development aid to developing countries.
  • President Biden is expected to issue an executive order on climate-related risks. The order would require federal agencies to develop a government-wide strategy on climate-related risks for public and private financial assets within 120 days.

Automobile Emissions

  • According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), transportation is the single largest driver of U.S. GHG emissions.
  • The Trump administration’s EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized rules that: (1) revoked a Clean Air Act waiver allowing California to implement its own standards for motor vehicle GHG emissions and (2) established less restrictive GHG emission standards for 2021-2026 model year cars and light-duty trucks than those established under President Obama.1
  • President Biden’s Day One Executive Order directed the EPA to complete a review of these rules by April 2021 (waiver revocation) and July 2021 (GHG emission standards).
  • Accordingly, on or around Earth Day, we expect the Biden-Harris administration to announce its plan to rescind that rule and begin a process to reinstitute California’s waiver.
  • We do not expect an announcement this week regarding the interim or new GHG emission standards. That announcement likely will come in July. Based on EPA Administrator Michael Regan’s recent statements, we expect that the replacement standards will be at least as stringent as those established by a landmark agreement between California and five prominent automakers.

Power Plant Emissions

  • The EPA estimates that the electric utility sector produces the most GHG emissions in the United States, after transport. The Biden-Harris administration set a goal to achieve a “carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035” as part of a broader goal to reach a “net-zero economy by 2050.”
  • In 2015, the EPA finalized the Clean Power Plan, the country’s first nationwide standards to reduce carbon pollution from power plants. In January 2019, the Trump administration’s EPA rescinded the Clean Power Plan and replaced it with the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, but the D.C. Circuit vacated both the rescission rule and the ACE Rule in January 2021, essentially leaving no regulations in place.
  • Regan has indicated that the EPA plans to promulgate new power plant regulations, but it is not clear whether the Biden-Harris administration will make any concrete announcements this week given its relative silence vis-a-vis the coal industry, the rule’s inherent complexity, the inevitable industry pushback and the careful legal strategy needed to survive the Supreme Court’s eventual review.

Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas

  • During the 2020 campaign, President Biden pledged to require “aggressive methane pollution limits for new and existing oil and gas operations.”
  • In September 2020, the EPA finalized a rule that: (1) removed oil and gas transmission and storage facilities from the categories of sources subject to Obama-era standards for methane and volatile organic compound emissions, (2) rescinded those standards and (3) rescinded the methane-specific requirements of those standards applicable to oil and gas production and processing facilities. The rule also established a new procedural requirement for the EPA to meet before it can promulgate new standards for some air pollutants.
  • President Biden’s Day One Executive Order directed the EPA, by September 2021, to reconsider the rule and propose new regulations that set performance and emissions standards from existing oil and gas operations (including exploration and production, transmission, processing and storage activities). The President’s infrastructure plan also calls for Congress to provide funding to plug orphan oil and gas wells, targeting another source of the industry’s methane emissions.
  • Congress plans to invoke the Congressional Review Act to cancel the Trump-era rule, in which case the EPA would not need to use the rulemaking process to rescind it (but also could not impose a rule “in substantially the same form”). Notwithstanding the potential for Congress to reject the rule, President Biden’s executive order gives the EPA until September 2021 to propose new methane regulations. Thus, we will not see a new proposed rule this week, but we expect the Biden-Harris administration to make an announcement on Earth Day that outlines its overall approach to reducing air emissions, including methane. That approach could answer calls from environmental groups to set economy-wide methane emissions reduction targets.

Climate change is taking center stage in Washington, D.C. this week-as it has throughout these first hundred days of the Biden-Harris administration—in unprecedented ways. The federal government, civil society, and an ever-increasing swell of U.S. business and industry appear to be pulling together toward a low-carbon economy. The release of the NDC and other actions during the coming days should offer critical details the U.S. plans to catalyze actions to achieve its lofty climate aspirations at home and abroad.


1 The D.C. Circuit recently issued a stay in the litigation surrounding the revocation of California’s waiver based on the agencies’ reconsideration.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

February 19, 2025

Wind energy projects along the coasts are facing uncertainty due to President Trump’s Presidential Memorandum1 issued on January 20, “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” This Memorandum introduces substantial policy changes that impact both onshore and offshore wind development.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 24, 2025

Beginning on Monday, there have been a flurry of executive orders from the Trump administration reversing Biden-era energy policies, emphasizing oil and gas production, lifting the liquified natural gas (LNG) export permitting pause and withdrawing from all accords and commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) including the Paris climate agreement. The orders also target electric vehicles (EVs), wind energy, international climate aid and the use of the social cost of carbon in agency decision making. For close tracking of these orders and more to come, visit the Akin Trump Executive Order tracker. Concurrently, President Trump’s nominees for the Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have each passed their initial rounds of committee confirmation votes, and now await votes before the Senate floor.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 10, 2025

In the final days of his term, President Joe Biden has taken significant steps to solidify his administration’s climate legacy. The administration finalized rules for various clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, these rules, intended to stimulate clean energy advancements through 2032, face opposition from Congressional Republicans, who are considering scaling back or repealing the credits through budget reconciliation.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 19, 2024

The twilight hours of the Biden administration and the 118th Congress have been marked by intense legislative and regulatory activity, underscored by President-elect Trump’s derailment of last-minute congressional budget talks, and stalled progress on energy permitting reforms.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.