COP27: A Fair COP or a COP Out?

Nov 14, 2022

Reading Time : 6 min

By: Alex Harrison, Kenneth J. Markowitz, Kerry Mackenzie (Public Policy Specialist)

  • UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, set the tone in his opening remarks when he said,

We are on a highway to climate hell with our foot on the accelerator” noting that “Greenhouse gas emissions keep growing. Global temperatures keep rising. And our planet is fast approaching tipping points that will make climate chaos irreversible”.

  • The UN Environment Programme’s own Emission Gap Report 2022 concludes that the international community is falling far short of the Paris Agreement goals, with no credible pathway to 1.5°C, current policies on a trajectory for a 2.8°C temperature rise by 2100 and current pledges delivering a 2.4-2.6°C temperature rise.
  • Various news outlets ran stories in support of that theme highlighting studies that identified that 90 percent of coal and 60 percent of oil and gas reserves would need to remain in the ground and that the world’s largest carmakers would need to shelve current plans to build 400 million combustion engine vehicles to stay within the goal set by the Paris Agreement at COP 21 in 2015 to limit global warming to well below 2°C and preferably to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels.
  • The Egyptian Presidency launch COP27 with a strong political focus on “loss and damage” and “climate justice”—seeking to hold the biggest fossil fuel polluters liable for the loss and damage caused by climate change—which, it has been estimated, could cost developing countries up to $580 billion in annual climate damages by 2030, and more than $1 trillion per year by 2050. At COP27, loss and damage made its way onto the formal agenda for the first time. Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of Barbados, was typically forthright in her views on the subject calling for a tax on fossil fuel companies to fund loss and damage projects and saying,

We were the ones whose blood, sweat and tears financed the industrial revolution. Are we now to face double jeopardy by having to pay the cost as a result of those greenhouse gases from the industrial revolution? That is fundamentally unfair.

By the end of the week, attention had shifted, back to the issues associated with the deep decarbonization necessary to make best efforts to comport with the aspirations established in Paris.

  • Developing countries continued to focus on holding donor countries accountable for commitments to mobilize collectively $100 billion of climate finance per year by between 2020 and 2025, to support their efforts in cutting emissions and preparing for the impacts of climate change. This was a key focus at COP26 in Glasgow with the goal originally set at COP15 in Copenhagen in 2009 and the deadline for delivery extended from 2020 to 2025 at COP21 in Paris. The goal has not yet been reached, but the EU’s projections indicate that donor countries will deliver on their commitment by 2023.
  • Parties made renewed calls for an international fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty, which would phase out the use of coal, oil and gas, with the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu following its neighbor Vanuatu in leading calls for such a treaty. Commenting on the proposal, Tzeporah Berman, chair of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, said

For 30 years we have been making emissions reductions targets but the fossil fuel industry has been continuously expanding production. We are trying to reduce the demand for fossil fuels without reducing the supply, which is like trying to cut with one half of the scissors. There is no treaty on what governments can produce and where and, without a treaty, we will be unable to bend the curve on emissions.

  • Methane mitigation has played a central role in the discussions, as the scientific community rallies support for this highly potent short-lived climate pollutant (with over 80 times the global warming potential of CO2 in its first 20 years in the atmosphere). To that end, President Biden and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced more rigorous standards to cut methane emissions, which are aimed at cutting 87 percent of methane emissions from the pollution sources EPA regulates by 2030 from 2005 levels. The proposal targets drilling sites, including smaller wells that emit less than three tons of methane per year, by requiring them to be monitored for leaks until they are closed. It also compels site operators to respond to credible third-party reports of high-volume methane leaks and tightens regulations on flaring.
  • Striking a contrasting tune, Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub prominently voiced a challenge to parties arguing that responsibility for climate change rests solely with fossil fuel majors, saying:

This is not a problem that just the oil and gas industry has. Everybody that uses a product that was generated from oil and gas has a part in this and is also responsible. Your iPhone, you are responsible for that. If you flew over here [to COP27], you are responsible for what you used here. The nice clothes you are wearing right now, you are responsible. If we don’t all step up and take accountability, this doesn’t happen. You are still there thinking ‘oil and gas companies need to go away, they need to shut down their production’. You don’t understand what would happen to you if we did that. Your television goes away, … driving goes away. That’s why the transition has to be better designed. We’ve got to be much more thoughtful…. I’m saying the world is responsible”.

  • Carbon credits and carbon pricing featured highly in the discussions, with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva arguing for the benefits of more robust global carbon prices, saying

Unless we price carbon predictably on a trajectory that gets us at least to USD 75 average price per ton of carbon in 2030, we simply don’t create the incentive for businesses and consumers to shift”.

  • Verra, which manages the world’s leading voluntary carbon markets standards and registration program for voluntary climate that mobilize finance to projects that avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or sequester carbon from the atmosphere, the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) Program, announced its issuance of its one billionth carbon credit, while recognizing the growing pains the market is facing driven by the proliferation of carbon projects and demand for high quality credits to offset goals and commitments.
  • There was also a sense of frustration, which ranged from immediate on-the-ground concerns about topics such as limited, expensive and carbon intensive catering options and sponsorship of the conference by a company ranked amongst the world’s largest plastic purveyor of plastic packaging, to real macro concerns about a perceived lack of progress on the implementation of climate solutions, after the Paris Agreement rulebook was largely settled at COP26 in Glasgow in 2021.

Other notable week 1 highlights included:

  • U.S. Climate envoy John Kerry’s proposal for a new billion-dollar carbon credit program aimed at allowing developed countries to help developing countries cut back on fossil fuel emissions.
  • The launch of the African Carbon Markets Initiative (ACMI) in a report that set out plans to create a $1.5 billion a year voluntary carbon market by 2050.
  • The United States and the European Union (EU) in talks regarding the trade tensions triggered by the Inflation Reduction Act (H.R. 5376). EU officials are displeased that the law puts its vehicle and battery manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage.
  • Climate Action Tracker, a collaborative research project tracking emissions reduction progress, released a new edition of its report, which predicted that fossil fuel projects initiated by countries this year in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could emit 10 percent of the world’s remaining carbon budget.
  • A group of countries that represent more than half of the global economy, including the United States, Germany, Canada and Japan, announced their commitment to 25 “Priority Actions” that they will unveil at COP28 in Abu Dhabi. This initiative, originally called the “Breakthrough Agenda,” highlights phasing out gasoline-driven vehicles, addressing emissions in the agricultural industry and investing in clean hydrogen, among other actions.
  • The UN International Organization for Standardization (ISO) launched a set of guidelines that helps organizations craft “clear” net-zero emissions plans. ISO’s guidelines were developed by 1,200 organizations and experts from over 100 countries.

The focus and endgame for week 2 will be on settling the yet to be published “cover text”, highlight transportation and energy action to reduce GHG emissions, the recording the official outcomes and pledges from the conference, with commitments to the phase down or phase out of fossil fuels and, in particular, coal set to be once again amongst the key points of contention.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 14, 2024

With U.S. elections rapidly approaching, presidential candidates are expected to foreshadow key aspects of their energy and environmental legislative and policy agendas. In particular, the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 may prompt Vice President Kamala Harris to balance legislative progress with her environmental justice commitments. The proposed bill promises to expedite clean energy projects but also aids fossil fuel industries and potentially at odds with front-line environmental justice communities. While White House climate adviser John Podesta expresses cautious optimism about the bill’s post-election prospects, environmental groups are calling on Harris to oppose the bill. Similarly, Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, takes a nuanced stance on mining projects near sensitive watersheds, balancing the difficult trade-offs in advancing clean energy mandates while maintaining resource development. This exhibits the complex negotiations required to align bipartisan support behind the democratic ticket’s climate goals ahead of the presidential election.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 8, 2024

On August 6, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate in the 2024 election. Walz, a little-known figure in national politics, serving in his second term as governor in Minnesota, has implemented far reaching energy policies after winning a democratic trifecta in 2023. Two bills establishing a mandate for carbon-free electricity in Minnesota by 2040 and simplifying the energy permitting process mirror current federal policy proposals. Expect to see Walz on the campaign trail linking his experience to the need for federal action.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 1, 2024

On Wednesday, July 31, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a permitting and grid development package, spearheaded by Chair Joe Manchin (I-WV) and Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY). The bipartisan bill paves the way for renewable energy projects, oil and gas leases, and grid improvements, as well as reversing the Biden administration’s pause on liquefied natural gas export permits. This legislative progress aligns with the U.S. Department of Energy’s allocation of $30 million in initial funding to the Appalachian hydrogen hub, which aims to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions through hydrogen fueling stations and carbon storage sites. However, environmental groups are pushing back against the Manchin-Barrasso permitting bill as well as newly proposed exemptions to the 45V hydrogen tax credits by Senate Democrats, arguing that these changes would undermine carbon-reduction goals. Simultaneously, the Biden administration is investing $575 million in federal grants to enhance climate resilience in coastal communities, indicating a comprehensive approach to addressing both immediate and long-term climate challenges through legislative, financial and infrastructural measures.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

July 26, 2024

Key topics in Akin’s July 2024 Sustainability/ESG Policy and Regulatory Update include:

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.