StEPing Up to the Plate: Justice Department Restores Favored Enforcement Resolution Tool

Jul 7, 2022

Reading Time : 3 min

By: Stacey H. Mitchell, Kenneth J. Markowitz, Erin Magoffie (Summer Associate)

Why is This Important?

For many decades, federal regulators incorporated SEPs into settlement agreements. Put simply, a SEP is a project included as part of an enforcement action that provides environmental benefits. SEPs often are implemented through a payment to a nongovernmental entity that is not otherwise part of an enforcement action. The goal is to “more fully compensate victims, remedy harm, and punish and deter future violations,” while providing a direct benefit to a community or resource negatively impacted by pollution. In order to avoid running afoul of the Miscellaneous Receipts Act, the funds used to implement a SEP cannot represent a diversion of money away from a penalty owed to the government to resolve the violations at issue in an enforcement action; instead, SEPs supplement the civil or criminal penalties otherwise imposed. SEPs are a popular enforcement tool and oftentimes are considered a “win-win” situation for the regulated entity and the impacted community: The government and defendant facilitate real benefits to a specific community and foster greater engagement between corporate entities and their local communities.

Given their popularity, SEPs have been employed numerous times to help resolve large and small enforcement actions. In the Clean Air Act context, for instance, a company agreeing to implement a SEP may be more willing to negotiate a resolution with the government if a portion of the total penalty package is applied directly to help local communities monitor and mitigate the health impacts of air pollution.

Both states and the federal government use SEPs as a key component of enforcement settlements. For example, in resolving alleged violations of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Clean Energy Renewable Fuels (“Clean Energy”) agreed in 2019 that Clean Energy would undertake a mitigation project to deploy trucks with low-nitrogen oxide (NOx) natural gas engines in areas of California where air pollution levels exceeded applicable attainment standards. Through its actions, Clean Energy helped CARB study the role of low-NOx engines and renewable natural gas to mitigate pollution in the heavy-duty truck sector.

As another example, in response to an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement action concerning, among other things, alleged failures to operate emission control equipment and monitor emissions from a landfill, the Town of Brookhaven, New York, undertook a SEP valued at approximately $305,000. The SEP plan required Brookhaven to install a solar energy conversion system on the Town’s planned mechanics garage repair shop.

Since SEPs are available only through settlement (i.e., a judge cannot order a SEP in a case that proceeds to trial), they provide a strong incentive for companies to settle and collaborate with the government. Although the negotiation of SEPs can be a time-consuming process, the efforts regulated entities put into designing and implementing a SEP can provide both financial and reputational benefits that exceed those of a traditional settlement that otherwise would provide only monetary or injunctive relief.

Note, however, that federal (and some state) SEPs are subject to several conditions, including prohibitions against projects aimed solely at public education and those funding generalized research at a college or university. In addition, a SEP “must have a strong connection to the underlying violation of law…at issue in the enforcement action.” This historically has meant that the project must involve the same pollutant or health effects involved in the underlying violation. Although DOJ cannot actively manage or implement a SEP, the Department maintains the right to reject unworthy project proposals.

Since the Biden-Harris administration’s reintroduction of SEPs, the conditions for their use remain mostly similar to those in place before the prior administration’s prohibition. Notably, however, SEPs now require approval from DOJ’s Deputy Attorney General or Associate Attorney General. This seemingly minor change may mean that projects will be scrutinized more closely for compliance with the policy.

What’s Next?

The Biden-Harris administration’s decision to restore SEPs comes amidst the backdrop of what is being framed as a “comprehensive environmental justice enforcement strategy.” Resulting from one of President Biden’s first executive orders, this strategy undoubtedly will result in more attention being paid to those groups that oftentimes suffer disproportionately from environmental harms, including communities of color, indigenous people and those with low incomes. This attention likely will manifest in a greater proportion of settlements incorporating SEPs. We also expect to see more enforcement actions brought in environmental justice communities and a heightened focus on the disproportionate nature of environmental impacts during the course of an enforcement action.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 14, 2024

With U.S. elections rapidly approaching, presidential candidates are expected to foreshadow key aspects of their energy and environmental legislative and policy agendas. In particular, the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 may prompt Vice President Kamala Harris to balance legislative progress with her environmental justice commitments. The proposed bill promises to expedite clean energy projects but also aids fossil fuel industries and potentially at odds with front-line environmental justice communities. While White House climate adviser John Podesta expresses cautious optimism about the bill’s post-election prospects, environmental groups are calling on Harris to oppose the bill. Similarly, Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, takes a nuanced stance on mining projects near sensitive watersheds, balancing the difficult trade-offs in advancing clean energy mandates while maintaining resource development. This exhibits the complex negotiations required to align bipartisan support behind the democratic ticket’s climate goals ahead of the presidential election.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 8, 2024

On August 6, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate in the 2024 election. Walz, a little-known figure in national politics, serving in his second term as governor in Minnesota, has implemented far reaching energy policies after winning a democratic trifecta in 2023. Two bills establishing a mandate for carbon-free electricity in Minnesota by 2040 and simplifying the energy permitting process mirror current federal policy proposals. Expect to see Walz on the campaign trail linking his experience to the need for federal action.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 1, 2024

On Wednesday, July 31, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a permitting and grid development package, spearheaded by Chair Joe Manchin (I-WV) and Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY). The bipartisan bill paves the way for renewable energy projects, oil and gas leases, and grid improvements, as well as reversing the Biden administration’s pause on liquefied natural gas export permits. This legislative progress aligns with the U.S. Department of Energy’s allocation of $30 million in initial funding to the Appalachian hydrogen hub, which aims to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions through hydrogen fueling stations and carbon storage sites. However, environmental groups are pushing back against the Manchin-Barrasso permitting bill as well as newly proposed exemptions to the 45V hydrogen tax credits by Senate Democrats, arguing that these changes would undermine carbon-reduction goals. Simultaneously, the Biden administration is investing $575 million in federal grants to enhance climate resilience in coastal communities, indicating a comprehensive approach to addressing both immediate and long-term climate challenges through legislative, financial and infrastructural measures.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

July 26, 2024

Key topics in Akin’s July 2024 Sustainability/ESG Policy and Regulatory Update include:

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

July 18, 2024

On Monday, July 15, at the opening day of the Republican National Convention, former President Donald Trump announced his selection of Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) as his vice-presidential candidate, signaling a firm commitment to fossil fuel advocacy and opposition to renewable energy. Vance is vocal against President Biden’s clean energy policies, which he critiqued openly at the Convention. While the selection aligns with the broader Republican agenda of championing fossil fuels and criticizing current administration’s energy strategies, the ticket has drawn its own share of industry concern. The oil and gas industry has expressed uneasiness over Trump’s protectionist trade policies, fearing inflation and trade retaliation. The American Petroleum Institute, advocating for free markets and free trade, stresses the necessity of reducing trade barriers and maintaining certain tax incentives, including those for carbon capture and clean energy, to mitigate potential adverse effects on domestic energy production.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.