UK’s Post Brexit Emissions Trading Scheme Goes Live

May 25, 2021

Reading Time : 4 min

It was clear from the outset that the U.K. would introduce some form of carbon pricing mechanism following Brexit to assure progress in meeting the U.K.’s ambitious emissions targets (now set at net zero emissions by 2050 and a reduction of 78 percent from 1990 levels by 2035). During 2020, the U.K. government consulted on replacing the EU ETS with either a new cap-and-trade system similar to the EU ETS or a carbon tax regime. The consultation and the Brexit negotiations resulted in the announcement of the U.K. ETS modelled very closely on the EU ETS but not linked to the EU ETS.

How does the U.K. ETS work?

The U.K. ETS only applies to certain carbon-intensive industries including power generation. In summary:

  • There is a fixed number of allowances available each year representing the cap on the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted—this cap reduces over time.
  • At the end of each year, producers must surrender enough allowances to cover their actual greenhouse gas emissions (and some eligible producers (including energy intensive industries and the aviation sector) are allocated free allowances that can be used to offset part of their greenhouse gas emissions to prevent carbon leakage).
  • Producers can purchase allowances either through the government-led auction process (under which remaining allowances are released to the market throughout the year) or from other market participants creating a market price for carbon.

U.K. ETS – Market intervention

Unlike the EU ETS the U.K. scheme includes a carbon price floor of £22 per tonne (the average level of the carbon price under the EU ETS over 2019 and 2020). This is not new; the U.K. actually has imposed its own form of a carbon price floor since 2013, which worked as a “top-up” price under the EU ETS scheme. The U.K. government will consult on whether to remove the carbon price floor later this year.

The U.K. government has established the Cost Containment Mechanism (CCM) that provides for government intervention if there are extended price spikes, including redistributing the number of allowances for auction and/or releasing additional allowances into the system either from reserve accounts or from future years. Under the current framework, the CCM will be triggered if the average allowance price on the secondary futures market is double the average price for the preceding two-year period, for three consecutive months. As of May 10, 2021, the average price would need to remain above £44.74 for three consecutive months to trigger the CCM. In the first two years of the U.K. ETS, the CCM will be more sensitive than the equivalent mechanism in the EU ETS, allowing intervention more quickly to help address potential volatility in the market.

Early market prices

First day trading saw prices above £50 a tonne (exceeding the price for allowances in the EU) before falling to £45.75 a tonne in the afternoon after the first auction of additional allowances cleared at £43.99 a tonne. These prices were not unexpected given the recent price spikes in the EU, which saw the carbon price rise above €50 for the first time, but it remains to be seen whether the U.K. carbon price will trade consistently above the EU carbon price.

The U.K. ETS into the future

So far, the U.K. ETS is performing largely as expected and broadly in line with its EU counterpart. In the short term, market participants will be keen to see whether prices stabilize and whether the U.K. government will use its powers under the CCM. There are also likely to be a number of consultations this year in the U.K. on matters such as the carbon price floor, the full alignment of the U.K. ETS with the U.K. government’s net zero ambitions and the ongoing discussion regarding the potential for linking the EU ETS and the U.K. ETS.

Some possible further developments to look out for:

  1. Introduction of carbon border adjustment taxes on imported goods from countries that do not impose a carbon price are being discussed to protect domestic industries that face higher costs as a result of the rising price of carbon.
  2. A renewed focus on industries that are not currently subject to the U.K. ETS or EU ETS—will a form of carbon emissions taxation be used to encourage emissions reductions in those sectors?
  3. Growing market for carbon offset trading including from new market participants looking to capitalise on any volatility in the carbon price.
  4. Re-introduction of the use of international carbon offsets for compliance with obligations under the U.K. ETS and the EU ETS and the creation of a new market mechanism for linking international carbon markets.1
  5. What types of new financial products will come on to the market allowing producers to hedge exposure to the carbon price?
  6. Will consumers see carbon-intensive products and services increase in price as producers look to pass through additional costs?

1 The Paris Agreement provided that a new market mechanism for linking international carbon markets would need to be established after 2020 and as such credits created under the Clean Development Mechanism and the Joint Implementation (both established pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol) can no longer be used by producers to satisfy obligations under the EU ETS.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

February 19, 2025

Wind energy projects along the coasts are facing uncertainty due to President Trump’s Presidential Memorandum1 issued on January 20, “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” This Memorandum introduces substantial policy changes that impact both onshore and offshore wind development.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 24, 2025

Beginning on Monday, there have been a flurry of executive orders from the Trump administration reversing Biden-era energy policies, emphasizing oil and gas production, lifting the liquified natural gas (LNG) export permitting pause and withdrawing from all accords and commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) including the Paris climate agreement. The orders also target electric vehicles (EVs), wind energy, international climate aid and the use of the social cost of carbon in agency decision making. For close tracking of these orders and more to come, visit the Akin Trump Executive Order tracker. Concurrently, President Trump’s nominees for the Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have each passed their initial rounds of committee confirmation votes, and now await votes before the Senate floor.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 10, 2025

In the final days of his term, President Joe Biden has taken significant steps to solidify his administration’s climate legacy. The administration finalized rules for various clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, these rules, intended to stimulate clean energy advancements through 2032, face opposition from Congressional Republicans, who are considering scaling back or repealing the credits through budget reconciliation.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 19, 2024

The twilight hours of the Biden administration and the 118th Congress have been marked by intense legislative and regulatory activity, underscored by President-elect Trump’s derailment of last-minute congressional budget talks, and stalled progress on energy permitting reforms.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.