Trump Executive Order Tracker | Akin Public Policy and Lobbying

Protecting The American People Against Invasion (Trump EO Tracker)

January 22, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min
Trump Executive Order Tracker | Akin Public Policy and Lobbying

Key Updates

Summary

This Order directs executive departments and agencies to enforce final orders of removal (deportation orders), directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure efficient and expedited removal of those who have not been admitted or paroled into the U.S. and do not qualify for asylum, and directs the Attorney General, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize the prosecution of criminal offenses related to the “unauthorized entry or continued unauthorized presence” in the United States. It also orders that all available resources be allocated to create facilities to detain those to be removed.  

The Order establishes Federal Homeland Security Task Forces (HSTFs) in every state comprised of law enforcement officers or agencies to provide logistical and operational support to fulfill these objectives of removal and criminal prosecution and permits the Secretary of Homeland Security to authorize state and local law enforcement officials to perform the functions of immigration officers.  

The Order limits sanctuary jurisdictions’ access to federal funds and directs a review of all federal funding to organizations providing services to those who are removable or undocumented, pauses distribution of future funds pending the outcome of the review, and authorizes the termination of agreements deemed in violation of law and initiation of clawback or recoupment procedures.    

The Order further authorizes the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland Security to implement sanctions on countries that do not cooperate with the United States in accepting their nationals subject to removal from the U.S. and eliminate all barriers preventing “prompt repatriation” of these individuals; directs that Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations be limited, and that employment authorization is not provided to anyone who is not authorized to be in the United States; and directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to ensure that all agencies cease providing public benefits to those not authorized to receive them.

Legal Challenges

Case Name Make the Road New York v. Huffman et al  
Date Complaint Filed January 22, 2025   
Venue U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Summary

Trump’s executive order instructs the DHS Secretary to expand the use of expedited removal (ER). DHS issued a new rule on January 21, 2025, expanding the reach of ER to individuals anywhere in the country who cannot prove they have been continuously present in the U.S. for more than two years.

Plaintiff Make the Road New York sues several Defendants: DHS Secretary Huffman, ICE Director Vitello, USCIS Director Higgins, U.S. Attorney General McHenry, and CBP Commissioner Flores.

Plaintiff argues that the Rule violates the APA, the INA, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs ask the court to declare the Rule unconstitutional, vacate the Rule, enjoin and stay Defendants from continuing to apply the Rule to the expanded scope of individuals, and award attorneys’ fees. 


Case Name Organized Communities Against Deportations et al v. Donald Trump et al
Date Complaint Filed January 24, 2025 
Venue U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Summary

Trump’s executive order instructs the Attorney General and the DHS Secretary to evaluate and undertake any lawful actions, criminal or civil, they deem warranted based on any sanctuary jurisdiction’s practices that interfere with the enforcement of federal law. The DOJ’s February 5, 2025 memorandum, “Sanctuary Jurisdiction Directives,” confirms that the DOJ’s Civil Division will identify and, where appropriate, take legal action to challenge state and local laws, policies, or practices that facilitate violations of federal immigration laws or impede federal immigration operations.

Plaintiffs in this lawsuit are several Chicago-based immigrants and workers’ rights organizations. Defendants in the lawsuit are former DHS Secretary Huffman, USCIS Director Vitello, and ICE.

Plaintiffs argue that the federal government’s actions violate the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act. Plaintiffs ask for a declaration that the federal government’s actions are a violation of the First Amendment, a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from engaging in such actions, and an order setting aside Defendant’s policy of threatening or executing immigration raids in Chicago for the purpose of destroying the Sanctuary City Movement in Chicago. 

Case Updates Case dismissed without prejudice February 27, 2025 following Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.
Related Cases
  • City and County of San Francisco et al v. Donald J. Trump et al (February 7, 2025) (N.D. Cal) (Case No. 3:25-cv-01350)
  • City of Chelsea et al v. Trump et al (February 23, 2025) (D.Mass) (Case No. 1:25-cv-10442)
  • Centro de Trabajadores Unidos et al v. Bessent et al (March 7, 2025) (D.D.C.) (Case No. 1:2025cv00677)
  • Solutions In Hometown Connections et al v. Noem et al (March 17, 2025) (D.Md) (Case No. 8:2025cv00885) 

Additional Documentation

Share This Insight

Related Content

Trump Executive Order Tracker

The significant number of executive orders published by the Trump Administration cut across dozens of industries and areas of law. This searchable tool breaks down the orders and their impacts on specific industries and with in-depth analysis of specific orders.

Previous Entries

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 24, 2025

The Order institutes a new Civil Service Rule XI to ensure agencies effectively utilize probationary and trial periods. Civil Service Rule XI supersedes subpart H and requires agencies to affirmatively determine that the continued employment of individuals serving probationary or trial periods would benefit the federal service before the appointment is finalized. Civil Service Rule II is amended by removing section 2.4 of part 2 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations. The rule determines the meaning of a probationary and trial period and sets guidance for assessment at the end of the trial or probationary period. At the completion of the period, the employee will either be terminated from their agency or certified as an appointment that advances public interest. The Order is effective immediately, and the requirements will become effective 90 days from April 24, 2025. 

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

The Order seeks to promote artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and proficiency among Americans through integration of AI into education, providing training for educators, and fostering early exposure to AI concepts and technology to develop an AI- ready workforce. The Order establishes a new interagency White House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence Education to implement policies related to AI education and to establish public-private partnerships to develop online resources focused on teaching K-12 students foundational AI literacy and critical thinking skills. Directs the Secretary of Education to prioritize use of AI in discretionary grant programs for teacher training and the Secretary of Labor to increase participation in AI-related Registered Apprenticeships. 

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

Seeks to optimize and target federal investments in workforce development to align with U.S. reindustrialization needs and equip American workers to fill demand for skilled trades and other occupations. The Order requires the Secretaries of Labor, Commerce, and Education to conduct a review of federal workforce development programs and to submit a plan on expanding registered apprenticeships to new industries and occupations to reach and surpass 1 million new active apprentices.

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

Requires the Secretary of Education to hold accreditors accountable who fail to meet the applicable recognition criteria or otherwise violate Federal law, including by requiring accreditation seeking institutions to engage in diversity, equity, and inclusion practices through denial, monitoring, suspension, or termination of accreditation recognition. The Attorney General and Secretary of Education will investigate unlawful discrimination by American law schools advanced by the American Bar Association’s Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, and will also investigate, in conjunction with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, unlawful discrimination by American medical schools advanced by graduate medical education accreditors. Additionally, the Order institutes new principles of student-oriented accreditation, to realign with high-quality, valuable, education for students.

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

The Order states that the Federal Government will no longer tolerate known risks to children’s safety and well-being in the classroom that result from the application of school discipline based on discriminatory and unlawful “equity” ideology. Requires the Secretary of Education, in consultation with the Attorney General, to implement new guidance to local educational agencies and State educational agencies regarding school discipline and an obligation not to engage in racial discrimination under Title VI in all contexts, including school discipline. Directs the Secretary of Defense to issue a revised school discipline code to protect and enhance the education of the children of America’s military-service families.

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

The use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts must be eliminated to avoid violating the Constitution and federal civil rights laws. Disparate-impact liability arises where a seemingly neutral policy or practice leads to unequal outcomes for different groups. The policy is scrutinized for its potential to have a disproportionately negative impact on protected groups, regardless of any intent to discriminate. The Presidential approval of July 25, 1966, of the Department of Justice Title VI regulations (31 Fed. Reg. 10269), as applied to 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(2) in full and the Presidential approval of July 5, 1973, of the Department of Justice Title VI regulations (38 Fed. Reg. 17955, FR Doc. 73-13407), as applied to the words “or effect” in both places they appear in 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(3), and as applied to 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(6)(ii) and 28 C.F.R. 42.104(c)(2) in full are revoked. Within 45 days of the Order the Attorney General and the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall assess all pending investigations, civil suits, or positions taken in ongoing matters under every federal civil rights law that relies on disparate-impact liability theory. Agencies responsible for enforcement of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act must evaluate pending proceedings relying on this theory within 45 days, and all agencies must evaluate existing judgements relying on the theory within 90 days.

...

Read More

Trump Executive Order Tracker

April 23, 2025

The Order requires the Secretary of Education to take all appropriate actions to ensure complete and timely disclosure by higher education institutions of foreign funding. The Secretary will take appropriate steps to reverse or rescind any actions by the prior administration that permit higher education institutions to maintain improper secrecy regarding their foreign funding and require universities to disclose specific details about foreign funding. Audits and investigations will be conducted where appropriate to ensure compliance.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.