In Law360 Article, Akin Gump Litigators Discuss Consent in TCPA Cases

September 12, 2018

Reading Time : 1 min

Contact:

Jacinta O'Shea-Ramdeholl

Director of Communications

Scott Wasserman

Senior Media Relations Manager

Law360 has published the article “2 Courts Accept Contract Terms That Limit TCPA Exposure,” written by Akin Gump litigation partners Meredith Slawe, Michael McTigue and Michael Stortz and associate Marshall Baker. The article examines some of the ways that companies can reduce the risk of exposure to litigation involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and what to expect from the Federal Communications Commission in the future with regard to debt collection calls.

The authors begin with a look at a major issue regarding the TCPA, which is “whether a called party has provided prior express consent to receive certain telephone calls (or text messages, which are treated as calls under the TCPA) using an [automatic telephone dialing system] or a prerecorded voice.” They write that plaintiffs occasionally “assert claims by arguing that any consent provided was subsequently revoked, at an often unspecified time.” While several courts, they note, “have previously held that consumers may indeed revoke consent — at times relying on FCC orders — more recent decisions reveal that revocation is not absolute.”

As an example, the authors cite a case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, Reyes v. Lincoln Automotive Financial Services, in which it was found that the plaintiff’s revocation was ineffective. While no other appellate courts have followed the rationale used in Reyes, other district courts have, adding “to the growing body of cases that have held that revocation of consent in TCPA actions is limited in instances where that consent was obtained through a bargained-for contract.”

Slawe, McTigue, Stortz and Baker write that the FCC “has yet to address the scenario of consent obtained by a bilateral contract” in TCPA cases. As a result, the issue will likely remain an active one within the federal courts. In the meantime, they advise caution with the TCPA’s “other myriad regulations, viewing a consent as only one potential link in the compliance chain.”

To read the full article, please click here.

Share This Insight

Related Services, Sectors, and Regions

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.