Further Extension of the Federal Student Loan Repayment Moratorium

Apr 12, 2022

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Marta A. Thompson, Francine E. Friedman, Madison Hughes (Public Policy Specialist)

In a press release, the Biden-Harris administration cited the “unprecedented economic disruption” caused by the coronavirus pandemic as reason to extend the repayment moratorium, which was scheduled to expire on Sunday, May 1, 2022. Furthermore, the administration also recognized the need for the Department of Education to continue to improve its student loan programs. In its press release, the Department of Education announced that it would allow all federal borrowers “with paused [federal student] loans to receive a fresh start on repayment by eliminating the impact of delinquency and default and allowing them to reenter repayment in good standing.”

Despite praising the Biden-Harris administration for extending the federal student loan repayment moratorium, lawmakers are still calling for more action. For example, the Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), urged the administration to enact “long-lasting change and a student loan system that actually works for students and borrowers [such as] forgiv[ing] some debt for all borrowers and fix[ing] [the] student loan system once and for all … by fixing [the] badly broken income-driven repayment system and creating a new Public Service Loan Forgiveness program that works for public servants.” Sen. Murray also underscored the need to extend the moratorium until 2023.

Sen. Murray is not alone with her call to action. Lawmakers have introduced a slew of bills relating to federal student loan forgiveness, including:

  • Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the Affordable Loans for Any Student Act (H.R. 7288 and S. 3953). This bill, if passed and enacted, would overhaul the existing federal student system and provide federal borrowers with a choice between two plans: a fixed repayment plan with equal monthly payments sufficient to repay the loan and accrued interest over ten years, or an income-based repayment plan with borrowers paying ten percent of their income above the poverty level that is capped at 20 years of payment according to its press release.
  • Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) introduced the Student Loan Forgiveness for Frontline Health Workers Act (H.R. 2418 and S. 3828). This bill, if passed and enacted, would establish a federal and private loan forgiveness program for health care workers who made significant contributions during the coronavirus pandemic according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal introduced the Strengthening Loan Forgiveness for Public Servants Act (H.R. 4724 and S. 2478). This bill, if passed and enacted, would modify the public service loan forgiveness program to provide for partial loan cancellation based on the length of public service employment according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) and Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) introduced the Defense Community Teacher Support Act (H.R. 4053 and S. 2399). This bill, if passed and enacted, would make teachers employed for five consecutive years in schools located in military-impacted communities eligible for student loan forgiveness according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) introduced the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program Enhancement Act (H.R. 2447 and S. 2215). This bill, if passed and enacted, would modify the requirements for calculating taxable income to exclude from gross income payments under the federal veterinary medicine loan repayment program, or any state loan repayment or forgiveness program that is intended to provide increased access to veterinary services in such state according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) and Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) introduced the Recognizing Military Service in PSLF Act (H.R. 3486 and S. 1480). This bill, if passed and enacted, would count military student loan deferment or forbearance as qualifying payments to the public service loan forgiveness program according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-IL) and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) introduced the Retaining Educators Takes Added Investment Now (RETAIN) Act (H.R. 1732 and S. 686). This bill, if passed and enacted, would provide a refundable tax credit for early childhood educators, teachers, early childhood education program directors, school leaders and school-based mental health services providers based upon the number of school years for which such individuals have been continuously employed according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) introduced the Student Loan Tax Relief Act (H.R. 1564 and S. 496). This bill, if passed and enacted, would modify the tax treatment of income attributable to the forgiveness of certain student loan indebtedness incurred between 2021 and 2026 according its summary on congress.gov.
  • Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced the Leveraging Opportunities for Americans Now Act (S. 2596). This bill, if passed and enacted, would reform the federal student loan system by eliminating interest and replacing it with a one-time, non-compounding origination fee that borrowers would pay over the life of their loan according to its press release.
  • Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) introduced the Zero-Percent Student Loan Refinancing Act (H.R. 3024). This bill, if passed and enacted, would allow federal student loan borrowers to refinance their loans to an interest rate of zero percent until December 31, 2024 according to its press release.

Nonetheless, it is important to note that it is improbable that legislation relating to widespread federal student loan forgiveness will pass during the 117th Congress, and even more unlikely that it will pass the 118th Congress if Republicans gain back control of the House of Representatives.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Study Guide

May 21, 2024

The U.S. Department of Education recently issued final regulations governing Title IX, the federal civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities—such as public or private schools, universities, local or state educational agencies, and museums—that receive federal financial assistance. These new regulations, issued on April 19, 2024, and slated to go into effect on August 1, 2024, make significant changes to the prior Title IX regulations issued in 2020. Whereas the 2020 regulations included a narrower definition of sexual harassment and focused on due process concerns, the 2024 regulations—more akin to the regulations under the Obama administration—broaden the focus of Title IX to sex-based harassment more generally.

...

Read More

Study Guide

September 27, 2023

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently moved forward with a controversial new policy requiring foreign subrecipients to provide, at least once per year, copies of lab notebooks, data and documentation that support research outcomes described in a progress report to the prime award recipient. The new policy is in direct response to recent audits conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (DHHS OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), each of which raised concerns about NIH’s oversight of funds provided to, among other institutions, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. More generally, the new NIH policy is among the latest salvos in the government’s ongoing efforts to impose stricter security requirements on U.S. taxpayer-funded research.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 16, 2023

On July 28, 2023, the Biden administration issued “Executive Order on Federal Research and Development in Support of Domestic Manufacturing and United States Jobs” (the “Executive Order”). How federal agencies implement certain of the Executive Order’s provisions may have a meaningful impact on the existing university, academic medical center, and independent research institution technology transfer processes. Moreover, when viewed in conjunction with other recent actions, the Executive Order is further indicia of the administration’s ongoing assessment and evaluation of the Bayh-Dole Act's technology transfer model. Universities and other research institutions should therefore continue to closely monitor technology transfer-related developments and weigh in when offered an opportunity to participate in rule-making or other legislative or regulatory processes.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 2, 2023

Congressional Republicans are increasingly focused on ensuring that U.S. colleges and universities are properly disclosing gifts and contracts from foreign sources under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §1011f (“Section 117”). The Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce (the “Committee”) held a hearing on July 18, 2023 titled Exposing the Dangers of the Influence of Foreign Adversaries on College Campuses, which discussed the enforcement, and even potential expansion, of Section 117.

...

Read More

Study Guide

July 5, 2023

Following the Supreme Court’s June 30, 2023 ruling determining that the Biden-Harris administration did not have authority to carry out its student debt forgiveness plan, the administration released a fact sheet detailing new actions to provide debt relief and support for student loan borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision that overturned 45 years of protection for colleges and universities considering the race of applicants in their admissions process. The Court found that the use of race-conscious admissions by the University of North Carolina and Harvard University is not constitutional.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 30, in Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan in a 6-3 decision. The plan, which was estimated to impact more than $430 billion of student loan principal, would have canceled student loan debt for more than 40 million borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

March 27, 2023

H.R. 5, the Parental Bill of Rights Act, passed in the House of Representatives on Friday, March 24, 2023 by a vote of 213 – 208. Only Republicans supported the bill and five Republicans – Reps. Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Matt Gaetz, Mike Lawler, and Matt Rosendale – joined all House Democrats in voting against the bill.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.