Understanding the 2024 Title IX Regulations: Expansions and Enhancements in Education Rights

May 21, 2024

Reading Time : 3 min

The U.S. Department of Education recently issued final regulations governing Title IX, the federal civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities—such as public or private schools, universities, local or state educational agencies, and museums—that receive federal financial assistance. These new regulations, issued on April 19, 2024, and slated to go into effect on August 1, 2024, make significant changes to the prior Title IX regulations issued in 2020. Whereas the 2020 regulations included a narrower definition of sexual harassment and focused on due process concerns, the 2024 regulations—more akin to the regulations under the Obama administration—broaden the focus of Title IX to sex-based harassment more generally.

In particular, the new regulations:

  • Define sex-based harassment as a form of sex discrimination. While the definition of sex-based harassment still includes sexual harassment, the new regulations also make clear it includes harassment on the basis of sex stereotypes; sex characteristics; parental, family or marital status; pregnancy, lactation and related medical conditions; sexual orientation; and gender identity.
  • Change the standard of sex-based harassment. Whereas the 2020 Title IX regulations required that harassing conduct be severe, pervasive and objectively offensive, the new regulations adjust the standard to require the conduct in question to be “(1) unwelcome, (2) sex-based, (3) subjectively and objectively offensive, as well as (4) so severe or pervasive (5) that it results in a limitation or denial of a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the recipient’s education program or activity.” Previously, the 2020 regulations also required that the conduct result in a denial of the person’s ability to participate or benefit in the program or activity; the new regulations expand this to include conduct that limits participation as well.
  • Increase schools’ responsibilities in responding to sex discrimination complaints. Schools are specifically required to respond promptly and effectively, utilizing a fair, transparent, and reliable process, when they have knowledge of conduct that reasonably may constitute sex discrimination in its program, and must take steps to prevent the recurrence of discrimination and remedy its effects; must communicate their policies and procedures to all students, employees, and other participants in their programs; must monitor and address barriers to reporting instances of sex discrimination; and school employees must notify their Title IX Coordinator when they have information that may reasonably rise to the level of sex discrimination, so long as the employee is not a confidential employee.
    • Previously, the 2020 regulations only required a recipient to respond only when it had actual knowledge of allegations of sexual harassment, and only in a manner that was not deliberately indifferent.
  • Impose a preponderance of the evidence standard in evaluating evidence of sex-based harassment. This standard applies unless the school uses the clear and convincing evidence standard in all other comparable proceedings.
  • Cover conduct that occurs off campus. The new regulations direct Title IX recipients to focus on “whether the recipient has disciplinary authority over the respondent’s conduct in the context in which it occurred.” This can include conduct that took place outside the United States and conduct that occurred online.
  • Provide flexibility for schools to adapt grievance procedure requirements to their educational communities. The regulations allow for discretion and flexibility to schools to account for variations in school size, student populations and administrative structures. They also provide a framework accounting for differences in the age, maturity, needs and level of independence of students in different educational settings, including that the regulations have special requirements for sex-based harassment complaints involving postsecondary students.
  • Provide protection from retaliation. The new regulations make clear that schools must protect students from retaliation from other students, and reiterates that schools may not retaliation against anyone for reporting sex discrimination or because they participated in—or refused to participate in—the school’s Title IX process. They also clarify that schools must respond to conduct that reasonably may constitute retaliation using the same procedures used for other forms of sex discrimination.

Significantly, while the 2024 regulations make important changes to how schools and universities must handle Title IX complaints, they do not include changes involving athletics. The agency’s rulemaking process for regulations related to athletics remains ongoing.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Study Guide

May 21, 2024

The U.S. Department of Education recently issued final regulations governing Title IX, the federal civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities—such as public or private schools, universities, local or state educational agencies, and museums—that receive federal financial assistance. These new regulations, issued on April 19, 2024, and slated to go into effect on August 1, 2024, make significant changes to the prior Title IX regulations issued in 2020. Whereas the 2020 regulations included a narrower definition of sexual harassment and focused on due process concerns, the 2024 regulations—more akin to the regulations under the Obama administration—broaden the focus of Title IX to sex-based harassment more generally.

...

Read More

Study Guide

September 27, 2023

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently moved forward with a controversial new policy requiring foreign subrecipients to provide, at least once per year, copies of lab notebooks, data and documentation that support research outcomes described in a progress report to the prime award recipient. The new policy is in direct response to recent audits conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (DHHS OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), each of which raised concerns about NIH’s oversight of funds provided to, among other institutions, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. More generally, the new NIH policy is among the latest salvos in the government’s ongoing efforts to impose stricter security requirements on U.S. taxpayer-funded research.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 16, 2023

On July 28, 2023, the Biden administration issued “Executive Order on Federal Research and Development in Support of Domestic Manufacturing and United States Jobs” (the “Executive Order”). How federal agencies implement certain of the Executive Order’s provisions may have a meaningful impact on the existing university, academic medical center, and independent research institution technology transfer processes. Moreover, when viewed in conjunction with other recent actions, the Executive Order is further indicia of the administration’s ongoing assessment and evaluation of the Bayh-Dole Act's technology transfer model. Universities and other research institutions should therefore continue to closely monitor technology transfer-related developments and weigh in when offered an opportunity to participate in rule-making or other legislative or regulatory processes.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 2, 2023

Congressional Republicans are increasingly focused on ensuring that U.S. colleges and universities are properly disclosing gifts and contracts from foreign sources under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §1011f (“Section 117”). The Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce (the “Committee”) held a hearing on July 18, 2023 titled Exposing the Dangers of the Influence of Foreign Adversaries on College Campuses, which discussed the enforcement, and even potential expansion, of Section 117.

...

Read More

Study Guide

July 5, 2023

Following the Supreme Court’s June 30, 2023 ruling determining that the Biden-Harris administration did not have authority to carry out its student debt forgiveness plan, the administration released a fact sheet detailing new actions to provide debt relief and support for student loan borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision that overturned 45 years of protection for colleges and universities considering the race of applicants in their admissions process. The Court found that the use of race-conscious admissions by the University of North Carolina and Harvard University is not constitutional.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 30, in Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan in a 6-3 decision. The plan, which was estimated to impact more than $430 billion of student loan principal, would have canceled student loan debt for more than 40 million borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

March 27, 2023

H.R. 5, the Parental Bill of Rights Act, passed in the House of Representatives on Friday, March 24, 2023 by a vote of 213 – 208. Only Republicans supported the bill and five Republicans – Reps. Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Matt Gaetz, Mike Lawler, and Matt Rosendale – joined all House Democrats in voting against the bill.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.