Senate Appropriations Committee Release Department of Education Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2022

Oct 19, 2021

Reading Time : 4 min

By: Francine E. Friedman, Madison Hughes (Public Policy Specialist)

When discussing the proposal, Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), the Chair of both the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee and the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies, stated that “budgets are a statement of [individuals] values and priorities – and [she] believe the investments in this bill are investments in a stronger, fairer future for all our country’s kids, workers, families and communities.”

However, Ranking Member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), expressed his opposition to the overarching budget proposal, stating: “Chairman Leahy’s decision to unilaterally unveil partisan spending bills is a significant step in the wrong direction. This one-sided process has resulted in bills that spend in excess of the Democrats’ own budget resolution and fail to give equal consideration to our nation’s defense … If Democrats want full year appropriations bills, they must abandon their go-it-alone strategy and come to the table to negotiate.”

Key priorities included in the request are:

Early Childhood Education:

  • Child Care and Development Block Grant: The Committee recommended approximately $7.31 billion to support high-quality child care for working families. The investment is estimated to benefit more than 2 million children in fiscal year 2022 if passed and enacted.
  • Head Start: The Committee recommended approximately $12 billion to help the continuation of high-quality childhood education provided via Head Start, a program created to promote the school readiness of infants, toddlers and preschool-aged children from low-income families.

Lower and Secondary Education:

  • Career and Technical Education: The Committee recommended approximately $1.41 billion to help states develop, expand and improve career and technical education programs in middle school, high school and post-secondary settings.
  • Charter School Program: The Committee recommended $440 million for the Charter School Program. While the proposed budget expressed lawmakers continued support of barring for-profit entities from receiving funding allocated via the program, they recognized that some charter schools enter into contract with for-profit entities to manage day-to-day services. The Committee stated that the Department of Education must “ensure such contracting relationships safeguard Federal funds from fraud, waste, and abuse; prioritize the educational needs of students; protect the independence of the charter school and its board; be fully transparent and sufficiently overseen; and provide reasonable terms and costs for services provided, among other factors necessary to eliminate the potential risk to Federal funds being used for unintended purposes.”
  • Education Research: The Committee recommended approximately $267.9 million for education research, development, evaluation and national dissemination activities.
  • Homeless Children and Youth: The Committee recommended approximately $146.5 million for states to support the development and implementation of plans on educating students experiencing homelessness and to make grants to local education agencies to support these children.
  • Rural Education: The Committee recommended approximately $200 million for rural education to help overcome unique resource and capacity issues.
  • Special Education: The Committee recommended approximately $15.5 billion for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Part B State Grants. It is estimated that the funding would help an estimated 7.6 million students with disabilities if passed.
  • State Academic Assessments: The Committee recommended approximately $58.5 million for competitive grants to State Education Agencies a consortium of State Education Agencies to “carry out activities designed to improve the quality validity and reliability of State academic assessment.”
  • Title I-A Grants to Local Educational Agencies: The Committee recommended approximately $33.1 billion for Title I-A Grants to Local Educational Agencies. This would be the most significant increase to the program if passed. Funding is equally split between targeted grants and education finance incentive grants.

Higher Education:

  • Federal Work-Study: The Committee recommended approximately $1.23 billion for Federal Work-Study, a federal financial aid program that provides part-time jobs to undergraduate and graduate students to help with the cost of education expenses. Funding allocated via this program would be distributed to approximately 3,200 institutions of higher education. Institutions must provide at least 25 percent of student earnings.
  • Historically Black Colleges and Universities: The Committee recommended approximately $400 million to strengthen Historically Black Colleges. Lawmakers hope the funding will address “historical inequities in higher education” and be used to “purchase equipment; construct and renovate facilities; develop faculty; support academic programs; strengthen institutional management; enhance fundraising activities; provide tutoring and counseling services to students; and conduct outreach to elementary and secondary school students.” The Committee also recommended approximately $100 million for the Historically Black Graduate Institutions and $22 million for Predominately Black Institutions.
  • Pell Grants: The Committee recommended approximately $24.28 billion in discretionary funding for Pell Grants, a federal financial aid award provided to undergraduate students who “display exceptional financial need.” This recommendation would represent the largest increase provided by federal lawmakers to the program since 2009 and would increase the maximum award to $6,895 for the 2022–2023 school year. Unlike financial aid provided in the form of a federal student loans, Pell Grants do not have to be repaid.

Please find here links to the draft bill text, bill summary and explanatory statement, from which the above information was pulled.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Study Guide

May 21, 2024

The U.S. Department of Education recently issued final regulations governing Title IX, the federal civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities—such as public or private schools, universities, local or state educational agencies, and museums—that receive federal financial assistance. These new regulations, issued on April 19, 2024, and slated to go into effect on August 1, 2024, make significant changes to the prior Title IX regulations issued in 2020. Whereas the 2020 regulations included a narrower definition of sexual harassment and focused on due process concerns, the 2024 regulations—more akin to the regulations under the Obama administration—broaden the focus of Title IX to sex-based harassment more generally.

...

Read More

Study Guide

September 27, 2023

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently moved forward with a controversial new policy requiring foreign subrecipients to provide, at least once per year, copies of lab notebooks, data and documentation that support research outcomes described in a progress report to the prime award recipient. The new policy is in direct response to recent audits conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (DHHS OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), each of which raised concerns about NIH’s oversight of funds provided to, among other institutions, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. More generally, the new NIH policy is among the latest salvos in the government’s ongoing efforts to impose stricter security requirements on U.S. taxpayer-funded research.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 16, 2023

On July 28, 2023, the Biden administration issued “Executive Order on Federal Research and Development in Support of Domestic Manufacturing and United States Jobs” (the “Executive Order”). How federal agencies implement certain of the Executive Order’s provisions may have a meaningful impact on the existing university, academic medical center, and independent research institution technology transfer processes. Moreover, when viewed in conjunction with other recent actions, the Executive Order is further indicia of the administration’s ongoing assessment and evaluation of the Bayh-Dole Act's technology transfer model. Universities and other research institutions should therefore continue to closely monitor technology transfer-related developments and weigh in when offered an opportunity to participate in rule-making or other legislative or regulatory processes.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 2, 2023

Congressional Republicans are increasingly focused on ensuring that U.S. colleges and universities are properly disclosing gifts and contracts from foreign sources under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §1011f (“Section 117”). The Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce (the “Committee”) held a hearing on July 18, 2023 titled Exposing the Dangers of the Influence of Foreign Adversaries on College Campuses, which discussed the enforcement, and even potential expansion, of Section 117.

...

Read More

Study Guide

July 5, 2023

Following the Supreme Court’s June 30, 2023 ruling determining that the Biden-Harris administration did not have authority to carry out its student debt forgiveness plan, the administration released a fact sheet detailing new actions to provide debt relief and support for student loan borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision that overturned 45 years of protection for colleges and universities considering the race of applicants in their admissions process. The Court found that the use of race-conscious admissions by the University of North Carolina and Harvard University is not constitutional.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 30, in Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan in a 6-3 decision. The plan, which was estimated to impact more than $430 billion of student loan principal, would have canceled student loan debt for more than 40 million borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

March 27, 2023

H.R. 5, the Parental Bill of Rights Act, passed in the House of Representatives on Friday, March 24, 2023 by a vote of 213 – 208. Only Republicans supported the bill and five Republicans – Reps. Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Matt Gaetz, Mike Lawler, and Matt Rosendale – joined all House Democrats in voting against the bill.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.